Published on:

Part of the secret to defending a personal injury case, isn’t in the defence of the case on its merits itself. Rather, it’s all about trying to find alternative sources of income or benefits which the Plaintiff is entitled to so that that money offsets any potential award. This way, if even if an at fault Defendant or large insurer looses the case; their damages exposure is limited by the amount of collateral benefits which a Plaintiff has received; or which a Plaintiff is entitled to.

The term collateral benefits is often misunderstood by Plaintiffs, or disability claimants. But, it’s a very important term for any Plaintiff in a personal injury case to understand.

Think of collateral benefits as an amount of money (or benefit) which a Plaintiff is entitled to. The Plaintiff may be receiving that money; or they may not. The money might not be coming in because the Plaintiff has not applied, or thought of applying for that benefit. We see this frequently. There is no playbook for getting injured. Nor is there a playbook for what benefits to apply for after a serious accident, injury or disability claim. Many Plaintiffs don’t know that they might be entitled to benefits; or they don’t know how or when to apply for said benefits. Unfortunately neither the law nor insurers care about that. If you are entitled or eligible for said benefit, you should apply even if you didn’t know the benefit existed. The law will treat the Plaintiff as if they knew about said benefit, and as if they were eligible to receive said benefit; even if they didn’t receive it. The set off will be applied irrespective of whether or not the application for the benefit was made or not.

Continue reading →

Published on:

In school, you’re not taught what to do after a serious car accident. There is no course or classroom lesson. This is something which people will learn from friends, family members, lawyers, reading, or through life experience.

While car accidents happen everyday,  the same people aren’t involved in car accidents everyday. They are the exception, and not the norm for individuals. But, the opposite is true for insurance companies. They handle hundreds of calls a day, and thousands of cases each year across the country. Handling car insurance cases is part of their business model. They are familiar with the ins, and outs, and what has to get done in order to process a claim and see it through.

Our personal injury lawyers have seen that people want advice in their time of need right after a car accident. They don’t know where to turn, what to do, or who to trust. Innocent accident victims are shaken up, and in a vulnerable state. They want to trust their insurance company to given them advice, and to point them in the right direction. But, the insurer has their best interests in mind, and not yours. They will try to set up the claim in such a way as to best limit their exposure in an effort to maximize their profits. So, injured accident victims need to beware, and take everything which the insurance company says with a grain of salt (or a large mound of it). The relationship between injured accident victim and insurance adjuster can get off on the right foot, but can quickly sour thereafter. A few denials here and there. An assessment with an “independent” specialist to justify a denied treatment plan. Things can get messy really quickly. Here are some quick tips on things to avoid with your insurance company following a serious car accident:

Continue reading →

Published on:

Most people around the Golden Horseshoe Area of Ontario woke up Sunday morning to snow. It was the first snowfall of the season. Normally, the first snow fall is just a warning shot. It snows; and it’s pretty. And very quickly, the snow melts away without causing any chaos. It’s a reminder to make our vehicles, our homes and ourselves “winter ready“. This means a mad rush to buy salt or sand for our driveways and walkways, getting our snow tires on our vehicles; having winter clothes and winter boots (which fit; especially for the children); making sure our vehicles have proper levels of antifreeze and windshield washer fluid (the stuff that works well in the winter); installing winter mats to our vehicles, homes and places of business and any other preparation that suits your needs for the winter weather. It’s quite a transition going from “this weather is tolerable” to “I don’t want to leave the house because it’s cold and yucky outside”.

After the first snowfall of the year, our law firm gets a lot of accident calls. Whether they are slip and fall calls, or car accident calls; we tend to see a lot more accidents after the first snowfall of the year. I have a lot of theories behind this. But, the primary theory always comes down to the fact that people aren’t ready for the first snowfall. They either forgot about how to deal with driving or simply walking in winter weather conditions. Or, they are new to dealing with winter weather conditions. If you are new to Canada, and coming from a country that doesn’t experience snow, ice or slush; then driving or just walking in your first snowfall is new and you don’t have the experience of handling these conditions. The other part of the equation is that people are taken by surprise by the first snowfall. They don’t have their winter boots ready. Their snow tires aren’t on their vehicles so they are sliding all over the roads. Finally, the city’s snow plows and salt trucks are ready, but they really aren’t in a winter maintenance grove because it’s their first time needing to be dispatched for the season. When you haven’t done something for a while (like trucks/snow plows sitting idle in a yard all year long), getting back into the swing of things can take time.

Continue reading →

Published on:

What makes the Toronto Blue Jays unique as a Major League Baseball team, is that they are the only Major League Baseball Team which represents and draws fans from an entire nation. The Toronto Raptors have the same standing in the National Basketball Association. But, the Toronto Blue Jays seem to do a better job uniting a country. Perhaps this is because they have a longer history to draw from compared to the Toronto Raptors (1977 vs. 1995). Or perhaps it’s because the Toronto Blue Jays have had more success in their sport compared to the Toronto Raptors (2 championships and 1 finals appearance vs. 1 championship).

When the 2025 Major League Baseball season began, even the most optimistic Blue Jays fan did not expect to see the results we saw. The Toronto Blue Jays had finished the previous season dead last in their division. They had not signed their star player, Vladimir Guerrero to a contract; and Mr. Guerrero’s pending free agency; became a distraction whether the team and Mr. Guerrero liked it or not.

In 1985, the Toronto Blue Jays made their first real playoff run. In those days, there was no Wild Card playoff round. You needed to win your division in order to advance to the playoffs. The American League East has been categorized as the most difficult division in baseball for years. Having to compete with the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox, even in their most grim years, is still difficult. Baseball is a fabric of those cities and cultures. The same can be said for hockey in Toronto. But, the same cannot be said for baseball in Toronto either. You can try to call Toronto a baseball town; which it is. But, when push comes to shove, baseball still plays second fiddle to hockey.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Lots of Canadians have been captivated by the Toronto Blue Jays playoff run into the World Series. A ball club which finished last in their division last year has made a historic turnaround which no fans or baseball pundits expected. They are the most mentally tough and resilient professional sports team I can remember.

One of the stories from the Toronto Blue Jays playoff run has been the injuries to the team, and their ability to cope with those injuries in order to compete at the highest level.

This got me thinking as a personal injury lawyer, and drawing comparisons to the injuries in the Toronto Blue Jays lineup and personal injury law. Specifically, dealing with long term disability cases.

When you think of long term disability, you have to think of it in binary or black and white terms. Either you are disabled, or you are not disabled. There is no middle ground or half way. For many people, this can present a major dilemma. The idea of going off work full time is daunting and scary. There is also no guarantee that the long term disability insurer will accept your claim. And if they do, there is no guarantee that your long term disability benefits won’t get cut off for one reason or another. It’s very scary to have to rely on your insurance company to make ends meet as unlike working, the payment of benefits is entirely outside of your control. You don’t know what the long term disability insurer is thinking; nor can y0u predict what they will do. What I recommend people do is expect the worst, but pray for the best.

The Toronto Blue Jays faced this predicament with a few of their players. You see, before a playoff series begins they have to announce their roster. There are limits on the number of players you can have on your roster. You want to have the right balance of starting pitchers, relievers, infielders, outfielders. Once the roster is set, you can’t go back and reset it, so that roster announcement is a very big strategic decision.

Continue reading →

Published on:

You will often hear personal injury lawyers refer to the term “tort“, or “tort case”, or “tort claim” or “tort law”. But what is a tort anyways? Here is a quick breakdown.

Torte: Noun: a yummy and rich, often multilayered cake that can be made with little to no flour, using ground nuts or bread crumbs insteadThese cakes are typically filled with ingredients like whipped cream, buttercream, jam, or fruit. Many traditional tortes, such as the Sachertorte and Linzer torte, have Austrian or German origins. Torte cakes are not legal terms. They are delicious deserts which make for wonderful housewarming presents. 

Torts: Person: John Tortorella akaTorts(born June 24, 1958) is an American professional ice hockey coach and former player. He most recently served as head coach for the Philadelphia Flyers of the National Hockey League (NHL). Tortorella has also been the head coach of the NHL’s New York RangersTampa Bay LightningVancouver Canucks and Columbus Blue Jackets. He led Tampa Bay to the 2004 Stanley Cup championship. I do not recommend bringing Tort with you into the Courtroom for a personal injury case. While I believe that he’s a great guy, and would make for a tenacious advocate, his expertise trends more towards hockey rather than personal injury litigation.

Tort: Noun: Legal: is a wrongful act other than a breach of contract for which relief may be obtained in the form of damages or an injunction. An act of injury or damage to a person or property that is covered by a law, so that the person can start a court action. Ontario car accident cases are divided into two cases: The Accident Benefit Part and the Tort Part. The Tort claim is the claim against the at fault driver who caused the accident in the first place. You will hear your personal injury lawyer describe this as the “Tort Claim” or the “Tort Case” or the “Tort Action“. Not to be confused with Torte (the delicious cake described above) or Torts, the Stanley Cup winning hockey coach described above. You can see how people can get confused!

Continue reading →

Published on:

I was watching the film All The President’s Men from 1976. It stars Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman as Carl Bernstein and Paul Woodward (Woodward and Bernstein) as the two Wash Post journalists who broke the Watergate Scandal involving President Richard Nixon. I was watching the moving because Robert Redford passed away last month, and I wanted to watch (re-watch) some of his work.

So much was different with the 70’s. The attire. The hardwire rotary dial phones (with multiple lines in fancy offices). The fact that people picked up their phones. If people were away from their desks, there were no answering machines. You would leave a message with a receptionist, and she (back then it was always a she) would leave the person a note (almost always on yellow paper) to call the person back.

What amazed me of Woodward and Bernstein was how easily they were able to access information, and how few barriers there existed back then to obtaining background information in those days. There are many more privacy barriers when it comes to access to information today.

In one scene, they attend at a library in Washington and they’re able to see instantaneously the names telephone numbers, addresses and amounts of all donors tied to the Democratic Party to elect the next President. With that hot list of contacts in hand, they’re able to knock door to door, or make cold calls. People actually either answered the door, or answered the phones to speak with these guys. Getting this sort of personal information so easily is almost unheard of these days. Getting people to cooperate with you is just as rare.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Insurance companies love to hear when clients have “After The Event” insurance or “ATE” as it is known in the industry.

What is ATE?

At trial, a Judge can order that the losing party pay for the winning party’s legal costs. ATE is a policy of insurance meant to cover a Plaintiff if they lose at trial and they are ordered to pay the insurance company’s legal costs. This means that the Plaintiff would be covered up to the limits of the ATE policy. The amount of coverage depends on the policy itself. The better the policy, the more the Plaintiff would be covered should things go wrong after a loss at trial.

How are ATE Policies Sold?

ATE is an insurance policy which is generally sold to personal injury law firms to insure ALL of their personal injury clients; or clients with similar contingency fee arrangements. You won’t see ATE insurance for clients in non-litigation sorts of cases. ATE can be sold on individual policies, but generally, these are either hard to come by, or very expensive. The companies which sell ATE typically sell them to personal injury law firms to cover all of their files, some of their files; or more than 1 file. The business model is set up for bulk files and not individual files.

Can I take out my own individual ATE policy?

I have never seen an individual Plaintiff take out and pay for their own individual ATE policy, although I suspect that it’s entirely possible. I suspect that the answer to this is “no“, but it really depends on the appetite for risk of the insurance company. They would want the peace of mind knowing that there is a competent lawyer advancing the case rather than a self represented Plaintiff. But, anything can be sold at the right price if the insurer is flexible. I would imagine that the premiums for an individual policy without a lawyer would be very high to the point of prohibitive. But, if you told an insurer that a Plaintiff was willing to pay $500,000 for an ATE policy worth up to $200,000; I don’t think the insurer would be opposed to selling the policy knowing that they would be guaranteed to make $300,000 on the sale  of policy. Anything can be sold for the right price. Continue reading →

Published on:

I saw a YouTube Clip of a prominent American Trial Lawyer not long ago. It was very “us against them” in tone, but the messaging rang true.

For years, and in some cases, for decades, hard working people pay their hard earned after tax dollars to car insurers for premium payments. In Ontario, it’s illegal to drive a car without car insurance. So, paying your car premiums is the law; so you have to pay these premiums if you want to drive legaly.

More often than not, these payments are made to the same insurance company for years because studies show that people don’t often change insurance companies. That means you’re dealing with the same insurance company year, after year.

And year after year, nothing out of the ordinary will happen. You will pay your insurance premiums, and receive the occasional letter from your car insurer enclosing updated policy information and slips. But that’s pretty much it. You won’t ask a lot from your car insurer. And, in return, they won’t ask a lot from you aside from demanding the payment of premiums.

Car accidents and catastrophic events are the exception. They aren’t the rule. You can go your whole life without ever being involved in a serious car accident. And, let’s hope that’s the case because nobody wants to be involved in a car accident.

But, in the rare circumstance that you’ve been hurt or injured in a car accident; you would expect that the insurer who you have been dealing with for years to be there at your side in order to pay you the compensation which you deserve.

At the end of the day, you were in the wrong place, at the wrong time and have done nothing wrong. All that you are seeking is that you are compensated fairly for your losses, along with your pain and suffering.

But this is not how things work in personal injury cases. Instead of helping you out, the insurance company will use their immense resources to fight your claim every step of the way. They will pay experts, investigators and their lawyers thousands and thousands of dollars (if not more), to make sure that you aren’t compensated a single dime.

Continue reading →

Published on:

I was chatting with my 8 year old son not long ago about house prices.

He was curious as to why a small home in geographically desirable part of Toronto would sell for more than a much larger home in less desirable town with less amenities and less access to services.

We spoke about the golden rule of real estate: Location, Location, Location.

People will pay more money for a home with easy access to transit, postal services, entertainment, schools, potable water etc. Living off the grid might be desirable for some, but not most people, and is far more difficult than living on the grid.

There is a golden rule for personal injury law as well: Credibility, Credibility, Credibility.

If a Court doesn’t accept what a Plaintiff has to say about their case; then chances are that the Plaintiff won’t win.

The same can be said for a Defendant. If a Court doesn’t accept the Defendant’s evidence, then there is a very good chance that the Defendant will not be successful.

But, here is the hurdle for the Plaintiff.

The Defendant, in the vast majority of personal injury cases, will only be able to provide evidence as it relates to liability (how the accident happened). The Defendant will not be able to speak to the other major 2 elements of a personal injury case. The Defendant cannot provide evidence with respect to causation. Nor can a Defendant provide evidence as it relates to injuries or damages. Any by not being able to comment on these areas, the Defendant can win the case. It’s an example of less is more. The Defendant won’t be able to dig themselves into a hole by saying something which they shouldn’t say; or by rubbing a judge or jury the wrong way. The Defendant will stick to the information which they know as it relates to liability; and then; in the majority of cases won’t have anything left to say.

Continue reading →

Contact Information