Welcome

Recently in Damages Category

Brian Goldfinger's Top 5 Christmas Wishes for Personal Injury Law in Ontario


December 19, 2011,

It's the holiday season! Time to get together with family, friends and loved ones and celebrate what matters most.

This holiday season, you'll notice a few changes to the Goldfinger Personal Injury Law website. Number 1: It's got a new look, new content and a new layout. We want to keep things "fresh" for the new year so we can keep up with the latest in personal injury, traumatic brain injury and legal car accident news and developments in Ontario.

Number 2: We also have a new look and a new feel for our blog. Let us know what you think about it.

Diving in to our reader mailbag, I have a question from Brett in Toronto. Brett asks:

"Brian, Merry Christmas to you and the team at Goldfinger Personal Injury Law. What is it you want for Christmas this year?"

Continue reading "Brian Goldfinger's Top 5 Christmas Wishes for Personal Injury Law in Ontario" »

But I was going to make a million $$$: Quantifying your loss of income claim in a personal injury case


March 24, 2011,

Client after client after client tell me that their personal injury case is worth MILLIONS...No wait...BILLIONS of dollars. The reality is that some cases are worth millions, other cases... well....just aren't.

The real money in personal injury cases is NOT for pain and suffering. Pain and suffering damages are CAPPED in Canada. You read that right. Pain and suffering damages are CAPPED in Canada. That cap sits at around $310,000-$325,000 or so; depending on inflation and who you ask.

The real money for personal injury cases is in future care costs and loss of income or loss of future earning capacity. This blog entry will examine what it takes to establish a past and future income loss claim.

First, in order to establish a past loss of income claim, you need to establish that you in fact held down a job, and got paid. Insurers and Courts are like the State of Missouri aka "The Show Me State". Courts and Insurers want to see your tax returns to establish a pattern that you worked and earned an income. They want to see your employment file. They want to see your time sheets and pay stubs. They want concrete proof that you were working and making real money. Telling an insurer, Judge or Jury that you made millions selling t-shirts in the street for cash won't cut it. If your earnings are not reported on your tax returns you will have a very difficult time establishing a past loss of income claim. If you were NOT working before your accident, then you have NO INCOME LOSS CLAIM, because you lost no income.

Showing income loss claims for teachers or other professionals with steady employment histories is relatively easy. Their tax returns should show a reported income in every year before the accident. Then, once the accident happens and the client is not able to work, the earned employment income reported in the tax return should go down in the years following the accident. This pattern is clear, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the dip in income.

If the Judge or Jury accepts that you were not able to work on account of your accident related injuries, then voila; a past loss of income claim is created and will likely be successful in Court.

But what if you're not able to work for the indefinite future? How do we establish and quantify your future loss of income.

Great question. The most boring job in the world is probably that of an actuary. Seriously. All these guys do all day long is look at numbers and calculate the probability of a pattern/event happening based on previous mathematical trends, stats and patterns. Basically, they're number crunchers and pattern finders. Sounds cool and very CSI; but it really isn't. Actuaries actually have some of the highest suicide rates amongst professionals.

Lawyers retain actuaries, accountants and/or economists to help quantify a client' future income loss or loss of competitive advantage in the workplace. These experts look at Canadian Market Trends, the client's education, background, work history, age, health and other factors to make a determination on what their income loss will be. The expert will be able to assess that the client will work to an average age of "x"; and earn raises based on inflation and Canadian Market Salary Averages increased to "y". And voila; your future loss of income claim is established.

Naturally, the insurance company will likely have a different opinion, but then it will be up to a judge or jury to determine whose opinion is more realistic.

Key in all of these claims is that the client's injuries need to be so bad such that that client was not able to work at all in the past, and not able to work in the indefinite future. Medical and vocational reports are necessary to help establish that the client is not medically capable of working. If you are capable of working, both in the past and in the future, then you will not be entitled to an income loss claim.

In addition, you are NOT entitled to double dip on collateral damages. What does that mean? Let's say you earned $50K the year before your accident. You received Long Term Disability Insurance of $30K along with $10K in WSIB benefits as compensation. This doesn't mean you automatically get an additional $50K from the at-fault insurer. If you did, then you'd earn $80K and you'd be in a better position post accident, then pre-accident. This is not how the law works. You'd only get $10K in damages for loss of income to top you up to the $50K that you'd previously reported on your tax return. You are NOT allowed to double dip.

At the end of the day, these claims rest with the credibility of the accident victim along with the credibility of the experts; both medical and vocational. If the judge or jury isn't believing your story, or that of your experts, then you will have a hard time proving your case.

What if Superman were involved in a car accident? The Law of Damages in Personal Injury Cases


July 26, 2010,

One of the most important things for an accident victim to understand when pursuing their personal injury case is how the laws of damages apply to their individual case. The laws of damages are very important, because at the end of the day, how damages work has a direct impact on how much compensation an accident victim will receive at the conclusion of their personal injury case.

One of the examples that we use to illustrate the importance of how the laws of damages impact personal injury cases, is providing the example of what if Superman were involved in a car accident?

One nice summer day Superman is crossing the street as a pedestrian on his way to the local library. Suddenly and without warning, a drunk truck driver runs a red light and crashes directly into Superman; while Superman is crossing on a green light in between a cross walk. The accident is clearly not Superman's fault.

There is a loud crashing sound at impact as the grill of the truck collides into Superman's body. Smoke flies into the air. But Superman's body doesn't fall back, because Superman has super strength. Superman doesn't even fall to the ground after the collision. Instead, the truck stops in its tracks once it hits Superman, leaving an indent of Superman's body in the front grill of the truck. Superman remains standing, while the truck stops in his path.
Innocent bi-standers stare in shock. They approach Superman to see if he's alright. Superman, being Superman does not even sustain a scratch in the accident. He is completely unharmed.

The police arrive to the accident scene shortly thereafter. They arrest the at-fault drunk driver and put him behind bars. Paramedics tend to Superman, but there is nothing to tend to. Superman, being Superman doesn't need any medical attention. He is perfectly healthy after the accident. Superman co-operates with the police and tells them his version of how the car accident happened. All of the information which Superman provides to police will be used against the drunk driver in the criminal trial against the drunk driver. Superman then leaves the accident scene as if nothing happened.

The next day, Superman consults with a personal injury lawyer about his case. He tells the lawyer that he was crossing the street with a green light in between a cross walk when a drunk driver ran a red light and hit him. Superman is mad because the accident was not at all his fault. Superman is not a greedy person, but given how the accident happened, he feels that he should be compensated.

The personal injury lawyer firstly tells Superman that he's honored and privileged to have him attend at his office, and that he's a big fan of all of his work. The personal injury lawyer then agrees with Superman that the accident was not at all his fault and sympathizes with his frustration. However, the personal injury lawyer then asks Superman what injuries he sustained in the accident. Superman gives the personal injury lawyer a strange stare, because Superman has never known what it's like to be injured. Superman then chuckles: "Injuries? Are you kidding me? I'm Superman for crying out loud! I didn't even sustain a scratch in the accident". The personal injury lawyer tells Superman that he's thankful that Superman was not injured in the accident because then Superman would not be able to do his job of saving the world. But, because Superman was not injured in the accident, there was nothing which the personal injury lawyer could do to help Superman with his case. The personal injury lawyer tells Superman that just because he's been involved in an accident, no matter how bad the accident, regardless if he was 100% not at fault; it does not automatically entitle you to compensation.

The personal injury lawyer then got Superman's autograph to give to his son. He told Superman, that should his condition change and that the experience any sort of pain, trauma, discomfort, anxiety, depression or anything else attributable to the accident, that he should come back to his office to see him again. The Personal Injury Lawyer also told Superman that he had two years from the date of the accident to sue should his condition change.

Superman was thankful for the personal injury lawyer's advice. He left the lawyer's office, and took Lois Lane to the opera later that night. Superman did not have to return to see the personal injury lawyer, because he was completely unharmed.

In Ontario, just because people are injured in car accidents, does not mean they are automatically entitled to compensation. There are tricky laws of damages at play which only a personal injury lawyer can assist you with. Superman did the right thing in consulting with a personal injury lawyer right away after his car accident. The lawyer told Superman that he did not have a case at that point in time. This gave Superman the peace of mind he needed in knowing that his rights were being protected.

If you have been involved in a car accident, or any sort of accident; be like Superman. Consult with a personal injury lawyer right away. But just because you've been involved in that accident, does not automatically entitle you to damages or compensation. Let a personal injury lawyer assess whether or not there is anything there to claim.

Why do damage awards appear so much bigger in the United States than they are in Canada?


January 3, 2009,

In the American news we see that accident victims get awarded ridiculously high awards for seemingly small accidents. Who can forget the story of the person who was awarded $1 million dollars because his coffee was too hot. Or how about the $20 million dollar awards for the elderly couple who scratched their arm after they fell off their bicycles?

Many of these stories, are just that, false stories. But, it cannot be denied that awards for accident victims in the United States are higher than awards in Ontario and Canada. The reason for this is because the highest court of Canada, which is called the Supreme Court ruled in a series of 3 cases that damages for pain and suffering be capped at around 3.25 million dollars. What that means is no matter how much pain and suffering you've been through after an accident, you damages for pain and suffering will be capped.

In addition, in Ontario insurance companies have lobbied the government to skew the laws in favour of insurers. If you've been involved in a car accident, you need to show that your injuries are both "serious and permanent". Serious means just that, the injury needs to be serious such that it effects your everyday life. And permanent means just that as well; your injuries need to last for the rest of your life. If your injuries really hurt for a few months, but then they go away completely afterwards, your injuries will not be permanent and you will not be able to sue for pain and suffering. This barrier to recovery is called the "threshold". The threshold was established for the benefit of insurers to keep claims down. That way, the insurer would not have to pay out on every little claim made, because it would not meet the "threshold". Also, insurance companies for have lobbied government such that the first $30,000 for each claim under $100,000 essentially vanishes in car accident claims. This is called the "deductible". If your claim is over $100,000, the deductible does not apply. Both the threshold and the deductible work to reduce the amount of claims being made, and work to reduce the monetary damage award to accident victims.

The laws for car accidents, and personal injury claims are complicated and constantly changing. This is why you need an experienced lawyer to point you in the right direction and help you with your claim from start to finish. Brian Goldfinger of Goldfinger Personal Injury Law is a Canadian trained lawyer who only represents accident victims. Call Brian today for your free consultation. www.goldfingerlaw.com 416-730-1777

This article is not meant to be relied on as legal advice, nor does it create a solicitor client relationship.